By mahandulai Started Tuesday at Sign in Already have an account? All this has done is created a watered down, bland Sikhi with a check-list of what makes one a Sikh rather that creating true Sharda Bhaavna Khoji Gursikhs, and actual Jigyasus By dallysingh Started 3 hours ago.
|Date Added:||22 May 2013|
|File Size:||6.44 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I feel they do not always get a true sense of Sikhi like they may with the sahhib Dharmic faiths. All this has done is created a watered down, bland Sikhi sukhnani a check-list of what makes one a Sikh rather that creating true Sharda Bhaavna Khoji Gursikhs, and actual Jigyasus There are hordes of Sikhs and non-Sikhs alike who speak about and view Sikhi in wholly Abrahmic terms.
Share this post Link to post Share on other sites.
Create an account or sign in to comment You need to be a member in order to leave a comment Create an account Sign up for a new account in our community. The reformist and revisonist sochni started by them has been detrimental to Sikhi, and today we pay a heavy price.
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. What puts people off becoming Sikhs. I don't necessarily agree with the OP's points but he makes a mention of Buddhism Why would you sahibb support such a massive change that Punjab and Sikhs are craving for or do you want the people of Punjab to continue suffering from religious persecution, economic persecution, further depletion of the water table, drug abuse, unemployment, cancer from uranium in water etc etc the list goes on. Now tell me why sovereignty and Sikh aspirations are so sinhg for the people of Punjab?
Giani Thakur Singh Ji | About
I do know religious Sikhs that don't support Khalistan. Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji! Sign In Sign Up. People are literally told what to believe, the do's and don'ts. What are you reading these days? Already have an account? It has also given rise to the kind of mindless debates Abrahmic faiths have with each other and amongst themselves Their legacy is a bunch of paranoid Hinduphobic, Indicphobic, and actually Sikhiphobic individuals who water down, twist and malign Sikhi to suit their delusional agenda.
We need to fix up. Posted May 21, By dallysingh Started 3 hours ago.
Index of /audio/Katha/Giani Thakur Singh Ji/Sukhmani Sahib
It quite evident even today how Sikhi is viewed with an Abrahamic framework. Sign up for a new account in our community. They tried to box Sikhi, westernise it, Christianise it.
By mahandulai Started Tuesday at No thanks, we have at least two which are central to the Sikh Panth, yet some Sikhs cannot seem to comprehend this and instead jump on the sensationalist bandwagon in the name of "Ekta". May the ridiculous idea of "One Panthic Rehat Maryada" die a swift death. There can never be one because there simply isn't one type sahiib Sikh and there never was!
It's an ideology, a school of thought, and a terrible, destructive one at that. What they don't realise is there was far more Ekta in the days of old and the shaib of disunity is due to what fhakur are in fact promoting.
Muslim Amere Dhaliwal faking as a Sikh. Would you care to elaborate? Albeit, this is changing thanks to some of todays prachaaraks and the strengthening of Sampardaic Sikhi; a more open-minded, varied and colourful Sikhi Register a new account.